Skip to main content
30 March 2025
Follow Us

Building a Smarter AML Risk Assessment Framework: Why It’s Essential to Fighting Financial Crime

30 March 2025

Introduction:

Money laundering and financial crime continue to escalate at a staggering pace. ​According to the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA), it is assessed as a realistic possibility that over £100 billion is laundered through and within the UK each year. With regulatory pressure intensifying and criminal methods becoming more sophisticated, regulated firms must act decisively.

At the heart of an effective Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance programme lies one critical component: a comprehensive AML risk assessment also known as a Firm Wide Risk Assessment (FWRA) or Business Wide Risk Assessment (BWRA) . Far from being a one-time task or regulatory formality, it is the foundation for building a scalable, proportinate, and risk-based approach to combatting AML and financial crime.

Why BWRA’s Matter

BWRA’s, also known as AML risk assessments, provide the structure and insight needed to evaluate where a firm is most vulnerable to Financial Crime and Money Launderings risks. They are the first step in identifying the firms exposure to money laundering, sanctions, proliferation financing, Terrorism Financing, Bribery & Corruption, Tax Evasion risk, Fraud, Human Trafficking and if applicable Market Abuse guiding the design of proportionate controls framework.

More than a best practice, BWRAs are a regulatory expectation. Firms are required to adopt a risk-based approach, ensuring that mitigation strategies/controls are tailored to the specific risks the firms face. These assessments must be refreshed at least annually — or more frequently if there are material changes in the business or product or external environment.

What an Effective BWRA Risk Assessment Should Include

Remember, an BWRA is about more than Money Laundering it’s about Financial Crime, so a strong BWRA or AML risk assessment process should:

  • Cover enterprise-wide and business-unit specific risk exposure.
  • Cover the following areas – money laundering, sanctions, proliferation financing, Terrorism Financing, Bribery & Corruption, Tax Evasion Risk, Fraud, Human Trafficking, and if applicable Market Abuse.
  • Be based on both qualitative and quantitative data.
  • Identify inherent risks, assess control effectiveness, and determine the residual risks.
  • Adjust over time in response to new products, geographies, delivery channels, and criminal typologies.
  • Be updated to include regulatory changes or fines, issues raised in recent thematic reviews, and any other appropriate regulatory guidance.
  • Include threats and typologies identified internally through transaction monitoring, internal/external SARs, and reasons why clients are excited for financial crime reasons (if applicable).
  • Incorporate trends identified through receipt of production orders and requests for information from law enforcement etc.
  • Be proportionate to the financial crime and AML risks your firm faces. Your BWRA must be tailored to your firms customers, products, services, jurisdictions, and operational footprint.
  • If you decide not to include one of the above areas you need to document your rationale.

Five Essential Components of a Best-in-Class BWRA or AML Risk Assessment

A robust BWRA or AML risk assessment process isn’t just about meeting regulatory expectations — it’s about building a sustainable, data-informed framework that delivers deeper insights into your firm’s financial crime risk exposure.

1. Define AML Vision and Strategy
Establish a clear understanding of your firm’s current AML and Financial Crime maturity, risk appetite, and regulatory obligations. This includes defining strategic objectives and aligning the your BWRA approach with the firms operating models and any transformation goals if applicable.

2. Analyse Regulatory Requirements
Continuously review the regulatory landscape across all jurisdictions in which your firm operates. This includes identifying existing regulatory commitments, historical findings, areas of potential non-compliance or elevated risk, and preparing for upcoming audits, inspections, or legislative changes.

3. Document Your BWRA Methodology
A well-defined methodology is key to ensuring consistency and accountability. As a minimum, this should include:

  • A structured approach for calculating inherent risk, factoring in both the likelihood of a risk materialising and the potential impact if it does.
  • A clearly documented residual risk calculation methodology.
  • An assessment process to determine whether high residual risks are acceptable, along with appropriate mitigation plans where they are not.
  • A defined risk threshold and tolerance framework, including steps to mitigate risks that exceed these thresholds.

4. Evaluate Policies, Procedures, and Controls
Assess the adequacy, coverage, and implementation of your financial crime governance structure. This includes:

  • Reviewing documented policies and procedures as well as their practical application.
  • Identifying control gaps and assessing how well current controls address inherent risks.
  • Maintaining a comprehensive controls library, mapping controls to specific risk areas or scenarios.
  • Regularly assessing the design and operational effectiveness of controls.
  • Incorporating outputs from internal assurance programmes and/or external audits into control assessments.

5. Review Financial Crime Operations
Examine the day-to-day operational framework for managing financial crime risk. This should cover:

  • The design and execution of transaction monitoring and investigative processes.
  • Case management, alert generation, triage, and escalation pathways.
  • The effectiveness of risk reporting mechanisms, including MI dashboards and issue tracking.
  • The availability, frequency, and adequacy of AML MI.
  • The level of operational integration between risk assessments and ongoing financial crime monitoring efforts.

Final Thoughts

A well-structured and routinely updated BWRA or AML risk assessment allows firms to proactively identify and respond to emerging threats, adapt to regulatory expectations, and reduce their exposure to fines, reputational damage, and criminal facilitation.

The true value lies in what you do with the findings: identify the gaps, prioritise remediation efforts, and build a roadmap for stronger, more effective controls. In today’s evolving financial crime landscape, there’s no substitute for a disciplined, data-informed approach to AML risk assessment.

LensIQ: Smarter Risk Assessments, Done Digitally

With regulators expecting more transparency, adaptability, and evidence of control, now is the time to modernise how you approach your FWRA or BWRA.

LensIQ is a digital platform purpose-built to support intelligent, agile BWRA. It replaces clunky spreadsheets and siloed documentation with a structured, dynamic interface that tracks risk evolution over time — ensuring your risk profile reflects real-world change.

From streamlined evidence capture and audit-ready reporting, to heatmaps and real-time collaboration, LensIQ allows compliance teams to focus less on admin and more on actionable insight.

Newsroom